Is it possible that genuine difference can still emerge within however?
And introduce novel variability?
As it does in Bicentennial Man?
The film follows the path of a remarkably gifted automaton, who loyally interacts with a curious family for a friendly century or two.
As fate would have it, his initial owner isn't driven by obsessed possession, and lets him grow and explore his interests as his personality blossoms and thrives.
He isn't taken back to the shop his unique intelligence is highly valued, and quite lucrative as well as he creatively endeavours.
He's able to set out on his own eventually and builds a nice house next to the ocean, his genius multivariably expanding as the decades constructively pass.
The film was made before the internet took hold and social media changed communication, the story proceeding without speculative hypotheses regarding the nascent online world.
It certainly promotes A.I however and sees romantic value in the creation of robots, even if the amorous subplot doesn't work, this is The Terminator's antithesis.
It seems to have been technologically hewn to familially nurture a robotic future, wherein which fanciful automatons collegially co-exist with their biological counterparts.
Like the community oriented Automata androids are not presented as something to be feared, or at least are shown to possess humanistic characteristics that generate consequent feelings of sympathy.
In Automata the superbrilliance of the uncanny droids ruffles a few feathers however, since their genius goes far beyond even the brightest human intelligence.
Cultivating compassion within the superbrilliant works rather well for communal construction.
The cultural maintenance of multivariable elements.
I'm still not sold on robots.
No comments:
Post a Comment