That's a lot of dough for maybe 20 hours spent meeting clients and doing a bit of research, show up, converse, agree, sign, and it's 6 more months living free and easy.
But there was a time when justice and reason inspirationally dawned and motivated, their ethical objective illuminations stoically crafting truthful light.
He doesn't plea he takes the case re-emerging from heartfelt pitfalls, an old colleague from back in the day providing ample inclusive support.
But the judge is resignedly stubborn and ornately impressed by antecedent repute, prone to belittling and austere exaltations of the concrete master narrative.
The opposition is equally dismissive of his regenerative resolve, and has lofty resources and a dedicated team at its institutional disposal.
A star witness suddenly disappears, leaving him without that much of a case.
But he digs deep and perseveres as jurisprudence comes 'a calling.
It's classic David & Goliath emitting resonant influential social justice, the honest driven innate perspicacity as level-headed as it is hardworking.
Truth indeed equanimically supports him as he clashes with litigious artifice, protocol and proper procedure favouring blunt ostentatious deception.
Theoretically the law persists beyond specific ideological constructs, each case consisting of unique arguments to be meritoriously considered.
Objective discerning judgment may lack attuned collegiality, but inasmuch as it upholds the truth it represents an unbiased ideal.
It's an ideal which cultivates fair play and resounding equality before the law, and is therefore fundamental to democracy insofar as it's apolitical.
The independence of a country's judiciary is constitutionally vital, and keeps impulse and ploys and caprice from wildly reckoning with fads unprecedented.
The Verdict seeks mercy and clemency far beyond authoritarian influence.
Legal objectivity favours both sides.
Through tried and true uncontested resiliency.
No comments:
Post a Comment