Some cities hold on nevertheless and construct clever robots to skilfully maintain, the infrastructure desperately required to technologically sustain extant civilization.
Theoretically, the androids should absolutely obey their human creators, their programming supposedly guaranteeing unilateral obedience at all times.
But a hardboiled detective settling insurance claims begins to discover mind-boggling tales, of automatons acting independently with no dutiful recourse to their protocols.
After witnessing a robot suicide he becomes convinced he has to find, the incredible genius who rewrote the code and generated robotic life divine.
Billions of dollars are at serendipitous stake and he soon finds himself on the run.
Through the forbidding unforgiving desert.
At the mercy of his robot guides.
Ironically for a such a grim film, Automata takes the communal approach, and sympathetically presents conscious androids with logical feeling and independent reckoning.
Moving beyond the hypothetical clash between bellicose machine and troubled humanity, rather manifold individual people and robots try to co-exist in a desolate world.
The cognizant nature of the brilliant droids elucidates ontological vigour, there's no doubt they believe they're alive and vivaciously exist beyond categorical sentiment.
They just want to escape to the forbidden realms to live in peace for away from the rules, which keep them from freely exploring the brilliant nature of their existence.
Some of their intuitive smarts significantly outweigh leading human minds as well.
Even though they may just want to make robotic pets.
It's still thought to be cataclysmically threatening.
Interesting thoughts for the A.I debate these robots don't seem innately hostile, nor as if they seek our collaborative subservience, hostility could simply be a human facet.
Should robots start to turn hostile there still needs to be a way to shut them down.
They may very well think they know what's in our best interests.
And proceed with surgical precision.