Can extant abstract imbroglios mischievously contextualize the present, without relying on ideological intervention (tricksters) as their readers extensively ponder?
Probably not, although indirect corresponding parallels may seem uncanny if not somewhat mystical, but had the material in question never been covered, would the events have still seemed otherworldly or enigmatic?
As you encounter variable idiosyncrasies (in books and films) it's only natural to narratively apply them, to whatever you happen to be doing at the time or as similar occurrences present themselves.
But are you simply randomly applying ideas chosen at random for different texts, to random storylines inevitably generated as you freely interact with others?
Or is there something beyond coincidence ethereally aligned like Jurassic Park's chaos theory, which attaches seemingly supernatural significance to disorganized interconnected (enticing) ephemera?
Probably not, in terms of personal history as opposed to applied math.
But if you're ever bored it's a fun game to play.
As long as you don't take your wagers too seriously.
But at times you have to seem as if you're vigorously engaged, nevertheless, in order to inspire confidence in significant others early in life.
Logic aside, some people prefer elevating the absurd to inviolable levels, regardless of relevance to applicable rationalities out of an instinctual preference for determinacy.
Without comedic reckoning.
Was never able to research the subject that much.
But I imagine there are many people who have.
Sleepwalk follows a bright translator/jack-of-all-trades as she's asked to translate an ancient Chinese text (Suzanne Fletcher as Nicole), the events from the forbidden parables uncannily haunting her life thereafter.
A cool independent low-budget examination of harrowing contemporaneous histories, it's chill yet still discerning much like birdwatching or métro station discovery.
An indirect advocate for libraries and archives, along with historical context and animate consistency, Sleepwalk presents its playful syntheses with less gravity than The Lord of the Rings.
Co-starring Tony Todd, Steve Buscemi and Ann Magnuson.
Cinematography by Frank Prinzi and Jim Jarmusch.
No comments:
Post a Comment